Environment: California Environmental Quality Act: overriding consideration.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. The CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. For projects whose environmental impacts can not be mitigated to less than significance, existing law authorizes a lead agency to find that specified overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment. If an EIR has been prepared and certified for a program, plan, policy, or ordinance, a lead agency is required to use a tiered EIR for a later project if the lead agency determines that the later project is consistent with the program, plan, policy, or ordinance, and satisfies other criteria. This bill would authorize a lead agency, until January 1, 2016, to incorporate by reference a finding of overriding consideration made in a prior EIR for a later project if specified conditions are met, including that the lead agency determines that the later project's significant impacts on the environment are not greater than or different from those identified in the prior EIR. (2) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 21094 of the Public Resources Code proposed by this bill and SB 1456, to be operative only if this bill and SB 1456 are both enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2011, and this bill is enacted last. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 5, 2009
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2010 · Assembly Jun 2, 2009
How they voted
25–1
Passed · 9 other
Total votes 35
Aug 24, 2010
D
Democratic23
69% Yea
R
Republican12
75% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
8
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2010
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 57. Noes 10. Page 6942.)
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-1-9)
senate
Aug 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 2).
upper
Jun 23, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 26, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (34-26-2)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 13, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 30, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 20).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
AH
Alyson Huber
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 231
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 231. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline