Electricity: net energy metering.
Summary
(1) Existing law, relative to private energy producers, requires every electric utility, as defined, to make available to an eligible customer‑generator, as defined, a standard contract or tariff for net energy metering on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer‑generators exceeds 5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. The existing definition of an eligible customer-generator limits the generating capacity of the solar or wind turbine electrical generating facility, or hybrid facility of both, used by the eligible customer-generator to one megawatt. This bill would require that the standard contract or tariff for net energy metering be offered on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer‑generators exceeds 6% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand and, until January 1, 2016, would reserve 1% of this limit for large commercial or industrial customer-generators, as defined. This bill would prohibit the electricity fed back to the electric grid by large commercial or industrial customer-generators from offsetting charges for transmission and distribution services. The bill would revise the definition of an eligible customer-generator to authorize generating facilities of up to 5 megawatts. The bill would make other conforming and clarifying changes. (2) Existing law requires electric utilities to ensure that requests for an interconnection agreement from an eligible customer-generator are processed in a time period not to exceed 30 working days from the date the application is received. This bill would require electric utilities to process these requests from eligible large commercial or industrial customer-generators in a time period not to exceed 90 days and would require the costs of required interconnection studies and upgrades to be paid by the large commercial or industrial customer-generator. (3) Existing law makes legislative findings and declarations relative to the repeal of provisions of the net metering program for large customers. This bill would repeal these findings and declarations.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
May 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 4, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 18, 2009
How they voted
33–26
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 62
May 18, 2009
D
Democratic38
86% Yea
R
Republican24
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
12
Amendments
8
Jun 17, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 24, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 13, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 10, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 22, 2010
Committee
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 19, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jul 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set.
upper
Jun 25, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 22, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 10, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 18, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (33-26-3)
assembly
May 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (May 6).
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 9. Noes 5.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 5, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 7.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JW
Jared William Huffman
DDemocratic
Co
SB
Sam Blakeslee Ph.D.
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 228
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 228. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline