County employees retirement: compensation.
Summary
Under existing law, counties and districts may provide retirement benefits to their employees pursuant to the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (CERL) . CERL specifies the minimum ages and years of service that are required in order to become eligible for retirement. That law generally permits the board of supervisors of a county or the governing board of a district, by resolution adopted by majority vote and pursuant to a memorandum of understanding, as specified, to make certain formulas for the calculation of benefits for its members based on their classification. The bill would provide that compensation paid to a retiring member to restore compensation the member would have been entitled to receive pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement fully executed on or before July 1, 2010, that was subsequently deferred or otherwise modified as a result of a concessionary amendment executed prior to September 1, 2010, shall be considered compensation earnable and not be deemed to have been paid for the purpose of enhancing a member's retirement benefit. This bill would authorize the board of supervisors of the County of Sacramento, by resolution, adopted by majority vote, as part of a negotiated memorandum of understanding with a bargaining unit that represents safety members, to require safety employees of that bargaining unit and unrepresented safety employees, first hired after approval of the resolution, to receive a specified pension calculation that applies to safety members and that computes final compensation based upon the average annual compensation earnable during a specified 3-year period. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 4, 2009
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2010 · Assembly Jun 1, 2009
How they voted
24–7
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 30, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
58% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
48
Key actions
14
Committee
15
Amendments
9
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 6946.)
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 31).
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 30, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-7-4)
senate
Aug 30, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 30, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 30, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Aug 27, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 23, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Aug 31, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 5.) (August 27).
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 14).
upper
Jul 6, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 26, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 16, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and JUD.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-26-1)
assembly
May 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (May 20).
lower
May 7, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 5, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 13).
lower
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD.
lower
Feb 5, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 7.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
AT
Alberto Torrico
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 226
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 226. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline