Hazardous substances: underground storage tanks.
Summary
(1) Existing law generally requires a local agency, as defined, to inspect every underground tank system, as defined, that is used for the storage of hazardous substances, at least once every year. After conducting the inspection, the local agency is required to prepare a compliance report detailing the inspection and to send a copy of the report to the permitholder and the owner or operator. Existing law authorizes the local agency, instead of performing the inspection itself, to require the permitholder to employ a special inspector to conduct the annual inspection. Within 60 days of receiving a compliance report or special inspection report, the permitholder is required to file with the local agency a plan to implement all recommendations contained in the compliance report or to demonstrate why those recommendations should not be implemented. This bill would require the California Environmental Protection Agency, by June 30, 2011, and in consultation with specified entities, to implement a process by which the local agency may verify annually the accuracy of the tank number issued by the State Board of Equalization, to determine that the tank number is the correct and accurate number for the permitted tank. The bill would require the local agency, pursuant to that process, to verify annually that the tank number issued by the State Board of Equalization for the permitted tank is correct and accurate, thereby implementing a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 6, 2010
How they voted
57–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 61
May 6, 2010
D
Democratic37
91% Yea
R
Republican24
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Jun 7, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 20, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
May 6, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-0-4)
assembly
Apr 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 28).
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Mar 25, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 25, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
IR
Ira Ruskin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2224
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2224. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline