Child care.
Summary
Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to establish a trustline registry for trustline providers who meet prescribed requirements. Existing law defines a trustline provider as a person 18 years of age or older who provides child care, supervision, or any person providing in-home educational or counseling services to a minor, and who is not required to be licensed as a child day care provider. Existing law, commencing January 1, 2011, provides that a person who provides care or supervision in an ancillary day care center, as defined, shall be registered as a trustline provider, and specifically defines a trustline provider as also meaning a person who provides child care or child care supervision in an ancillary day care center, other than the parent or guardian of the child receiving the care. This bill would, instead, require that, commencing January 1, 2011, a person 18 years of age or older who provides child care or child care supervision in an ancillary day care center, be registered as a trustline provider. It would specifically provide that nothing in the trustline provider provisions shall be construed to prevent a person under 18 years of age from being employed in an ancillary day care center. This bill would specify that a person is ineligible for employment in a position providing child care or child care supervision in an ancillary day care center if that person is denied trustline registration or has his or her trustline registration revoked, as prescribed. This bill would also permit an employee or prospective employee in an ancillary day care center to work in a position providing child care or child care supervision pending the department's review of his or her trustline application and any related appeal. Existing law authorizes the department to charge a fee to trustline applicants, as specified. Existing law requires the department to charge a fee to each trustline applicant who provides care in an ancillary day care center equal to the total amount required by the department to process applications and maintain the trustline registry for these providers. The bill would provide that the fee charged by the department shall be equal to and shall not exceed the total amount required by the department to process applications and maintain the trustline registry. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 4, 2009
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2010 · Assembly Jun 1, 2009
How they voted
25–6
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 31, 2010
D
Democratic23
78% Yea
R
Republican12
58% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
43
Key actions
15
Committee
14
Amendments
10
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-6-4)
senate
Aug 31, 2010
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 72. Noes 2. Page 6952.)
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Aug 30, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 30, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Aug 23, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28).
upper
Jul 16, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jul 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jul 8, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jul 8, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on EQ. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 7).
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E., U., & C. and EQ.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-11-9)
assembly
May 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) (May 20).
lower
May 6, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 4, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Feb 5, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 7.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 222
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 222. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline