Moore Universal Telephone Service Act.
Summary
The Moore Universal Telephone Service Act established the Universal Lifeline Telephone Service (ULTS) program in order to provide low-income households with access to affordable basic residential telephone service. This bill would replace the definition of "residential" in the Moore Universal Telephone Service Act with a definition of "household" and would make conforming changes. Existing law requires that a lifeline telephone service subscriber be provided with one single party line at his or her principal place of residence. This bill would instead require that a lifeline telephone service subscriber be provided with one lifeline subscription, as defined by the commission, at his or her principal place of residence. Existing law makes any public utility, as defined, and any corporation other than a public utility, that violates the Public Utilities Act, or that fails to comply with any part of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission, guilty of a crime. Because the provisions of this bill are within the act and require action by the commission to implement its requirements, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the definition of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Signed Sep 27, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2010 · Assembly Aug 23, 2010
How they voted
27–0
Passed · 10 other
Total votes 37
Aug 20, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican12
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
5
Sep 25, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-2)
assembly
Aug 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6486.)
lower
Aug 20, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-0-10)
senate
Aug 20, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 3, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (August 2).
upper
Jun 21, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 15).
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 12).
lower
Apr 28, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 26, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 19).
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FF
Felipe Fuentes
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2213
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2213. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline