AB 2210 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Intercepted communications: hostage taking and barricading.

Summary
Existing law prohibits a person from intentionally eavesdropping upon or recording a confidential communication by means of any electronic amplifying device or recording device without the consent of all parties to the communication. Under existing law, specified law enforcement agents may make a written application to a judge to authorize the interception of a wire, electronic pager, or electronic cellular telephone communication. In certain instances the application can be made informally and granted orally if an emergency situation exists, as specified. This bill would authorize a peace officer who is authorized by a county district attorney or the Attorney General to authorize the use of an electronic amplifying or recording device to eavesdrop on or record, or both, any oral communication in an emergency situation involving a barricade situation or hostage situation, as defined, if the peace officer reasonably determines that an emergency situation exists, that the emergency situation requires that the eavesdropping occur immediately, and that there are grounds upon which an order could be obtained in regard to certain specified offenses. This bill would require a written application to be made seeking to authorize the eavesdropping within 48 hours.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010 Signed Sep 27, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 18, 2010 · Assembly Aug 20, 2010

How they voted

33–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 37
Aug 18, 2010
D Democratic25
22 Yea 3
88% Yea
R Republican12
11 Yea 1
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Sep 25, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 20, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-2)
assembly
Aug 20, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6419.)
lower
Aug 18, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-4)
senate
Aug 18, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 3, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (August 2).
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 22, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 20, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 28).
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 7, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FF
Felipe Fuentes
DDemocratic
CA
39