Utilities: termination of services.
Summary
Existing law prohibits an electrical, gas, heat, or water corporation from terminating residential service for nonpayment of a delinquent account unless the corporation first gives prescribed notice of the delinquency and impending termination. Existing law also prohibits termination in specified situations. This bill would require a gas or electrical corporation to implement specified practices, including prescribed bill payment plans for customers who are subject to termination of service for nonpayment of a delinquent bill, and a prohibition on requiring specified low-income customers to pay reestablishment of credit deposits unless the low-income customer's service has been terminated for nonpayment of bills. The bill would also require the commission to establish a benchmark for termination of gas and electrical service , and to require the commission to require a gas or electrical corporation to conduct a biennial affordability survey. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act is a crime. Because this bill would be within the act, by imposing requirements on gas and electrical corporations, the violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 13, 2010
How they voted
44–26
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 73
May 13, 2010
D
Democratic46
95% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican26
96% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Jun 16, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 27, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 13, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-26-3)
assembly
May 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 5).
lower
Apr 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (April 19).
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2207
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2207. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline