Clinical social workers: examination requirements.
Summary
Existing law, the Clinical Social Worker Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of social workers by the Board of Behavioral Sciences. Existing law requires the board to issue a license to each applicant meeting specified requirements who successfully passes a board administered standard written or oral examination or both examinations and existing law also provides for a clinical vignette written examination for these applicants. Under existing law, the fee for the standard written examination is $150 and the fee for the clinical vignette written examination is $100. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2014, if the board makes a specified determination, instead require the board to issue a license to each applicant meeting specified requirements who successfully passes the Association of Social Work Boards Clinical Level Exam administered by the Association of Social Work Boards and a separate California jurisprudence and ethics examination incorporated or developed and administered by the board. The bill would provide a maximum $100 fee for the jurisprudence and ethics examination. The bill would also make conforming changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 4996.3 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by AB 2191, to be operative if AB 2191 and this bill become effective on or before January 1, 2011, and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 4996.17 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by SB 1489, to be operative if SB 1489 and this bill become effective on or before January 1, 2011, and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 18, 2010 · Assembly May 17, 2010
How they voted
28–2
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 34
Aug 18, 2010
D
Democratic23
82% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 73. Noes 2. Page 6386.)
lower
Aug 18, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-2-4)
senate
Aug 18, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 29, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 14, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 27, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
May 17, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (54-1-6)
assembly
May 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 5).
lower
Apr 15, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
PN
Pedro Nava
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2167
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2167. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline