Public contracts: claims.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a public entity to compromise or otherwise settle any 3rd-party claim relating to a public works contract. This bill would define "claim" for those purposes to mean a written demand or assertion by a contractor, a local agency, including a charter city, except as specified, or charter county with respect to the contract documents, as specified. This bill would, for contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2010, provide for a mediation process for claim disputes over $50,000 between a contractor and a local agency, including a charter city, except as specified, or charter county that does not have an alternative dispute process, if those claims remain unresolved after a specified time period. By requiring local agencies, charter cities, and charter counties to incorporate this mediation process in specified claim disputes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 3, 2009
Last action Feb 2, 2010
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Amendments
2
May 28, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
lower
May 20, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 7, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 5, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 28).
lower
Mar 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 12, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD. by unanimous consent.
lower
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and JUD.
lower
Feb 4, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 216
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 216. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline