Coastal resources: marine spatial planning.
Summary
Existing law declares it is the policy of the state to assess the long-term values and benefits of the conservation and development of ocean resources and uses with the objective of restoring or maintaining the health of the ocean ecosystem and ensuring the proper management of renewable and nonrenewable resources. Existing law requires the Ocean Protection Council to coordinate activities of state agencies that are related to the protection and conservation of coastal waters and ocean ecosystems to improve the effectiveness of state efforts to protect ocean resources within existing fiscal limitations, to establish policies to coordinate the collection, evaluation, and sharing of scientific data related to coastal and ocean resources among agencies, and to identify and recommend to the Legislature changes in law needed to achieve these goals. This bill would, consistent with the above goals and subject to the availability of funding, require the Ocean Protection Council, to support state agencies' use and sharing of scientific and geospatial information for coastal- and ocean-relevant decisionmaking, including marine spatial planning, by taking specified actions, to assess the needs of California's public agencies with respect to their abilities to gather, manage, use, and share information and decision-support tools relevant to ecosystem-based management in the coastal and ocean environment. The bill would require each state agency, board, department, or commission with ocean or coastal management interests or regulatory authority to cooperate with the Ocean Protection Council to achieve all of the specified goals, subject to available funding and consistent with each entity's individual mandate. The bill would authorize the council to award grants, enter into interagency agreements, and provide assistance to public agencies and nonprofit organizations to support the achievement of these goals and would require the council to give preference to public agencies that are meeting these goals.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2010 · Assembly Jun 2, 2010
How they voted
22–10
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 38
Aug 23, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican13
76% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
8
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 53. Noes 25. Page 6579.)
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-10-6)
senate
Aug 23, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 17, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 16, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (August 12).
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jul 1, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jun 2, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-23-3)
assembly
May 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 28, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 19, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 12).
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
IR
Ira Ruskin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2125
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2125. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline