Health care coverage: premium payments: grace periods.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability insurers by the Department of Insurance and requires disability insurance policies to include a provision setting forth a grace period for making premium payments. Under existing law, that grace period must equal no less than 7 days for weekly premium policies, no less than 10 days for monthly premium policies, and no less than 31 days for all other policies. Existing law prohibits the Insurance Commissioner from approving a policy for issuance or delivery, and authorizes the commissioner to withdraw approval of the policy, if it fails to meet these requirements. This bill would require individual health care service plan contracts and individual health insurance policies issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2011, to provide a grace period of 50 days for the payment of premiums and would make an enrollee or insured who fails to pay the premium during that period liable for any medical costs incurred during the period, except as specified. The bill would require plans and insurers to provide specified notice of this grace period upon issuance, amendment, or renewal of an individual contract or policy. Because a willful violation of the bill's requirements with respect to health care service plans would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2010
How they voted
35–24
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 61
Jun 2, 2010
D
Democratic37
94% Yea
R
Republican24
95% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 1, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 30).
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Jun 2, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-24-2)
assembly
May 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 19).
lower
May 13, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
lower
May 12, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 11, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 15, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH by unanimous consent.
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Apr 13, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
HD
Hector De La Torre
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2110
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2110. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline