Pharmacy.
Summary
Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of pharmacies, including hospital pharmacies, by the California State Board of Pharmacy, and makes a knowing violation of that law a crime. Existing law prohibits the operation of a pharmacy without a license and a separate license is required for each pharmacy location. Under existing law, a hospital pharmacy, as defined, includes a pharmacy located outside of the hospital in another physical plant. However, as a condition of licensure by the board for these pharmacies, pharmaceutical services may only be provided to registered hospital patients who are on the premises of the same physical plant in which the pharmacy is located and those services must be directly related to the services or treatment plan administered in the physical plant. Existing law imposes various requirements on manufacturers, as defined, and states that a manufacturer does not mean a pharmacy compounding a drug for parenteral therapy, pursuant to a prescription, for delivery to another pharmacy for the purpose of delivering or administering the drug to the patient or patients, provided that neither the components for the drug nor the drug are compounded, fabricated, packaged, or otherwise prepared prior to receipt of the prescription. This bill would provide that a hospital pharmacy also includes a pharmacy, licensed by the board, that may be located outside of the hospital in either another physical plant on the same premises or on a separate premises, located within a 100-mile radius of the hospital, that is regulated under a hospital's license. The bill would eliminate the conditions of licensure by the board that limit the services provided by the pharmacy in the other physical plant, but would require that any unit-dose medication produced by a hospital pharmacy under common ownership be barcoded to be readable at the patient's bedside. The bill would authorize a hospital pharmacy to prepare and store a limited quantity of unit-dose medications in advance of a patient-specific prescription under certain circumstances. The bill would also provide that a "manufacturer" does not mean a pharmacy compounding or repackaging a drug for parenteral therapy or oral therapy in a hospital for delivery to another pharmacy or hospital under common ownership in order to dispense or administer the drug to the patient or patients pursuant to a prescription or order. The bill would require a pharmacy compounding or repackaging a drug pursuant to this provision to notify the board of the location of the compounding or repackaging within a specified period of time. Because a knowing violation of the bill's requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2010 · Assembly May 13, 2010
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 38
Aug 24, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
8
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 6779.)
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-4)
senate
Aug 24, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 12).
upper
Aug 9, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 29, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 23, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
May 27, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
May 13, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-5-4)
assembly
May 10, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 6, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 5).
lower
Apr 26, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (April 20).
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 13, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P. by unanimous consent.
lower
Mar 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B. & P.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JS
Jose Solorio
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2077
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2077. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline