Advertising: business location representations: floral and ornamental products and services.
Summary
Existing law provides for the regulation of advertising in this state and makes certain advertising practices unlawful. A violation of the provisions regulating advertising is a crime. This bill would make it unlawful for a provider or vendor of floral or ornamental products or services, as defined, to misrepresent the geographic location of its business by either (1) listing a local telephone number in any listing or advertisement, unless the advertisement or listing identifies the true physical address, including the city, of the provider's or vendor's business; or (2) listing a fictitious business name or an assumed business name in any listing or advertisement, if the name misrepresents the location of the business and the listing or advertisement does not identify the true physical address of the business. This bill would also state that it does not create or impose any obligation or duty upon a person other than a vendor or provider as described above. By creating new advertising prohibitions, the violation of which would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Vetoed Sep 23, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 25, 2010 · Assembly May 13, 2010
How they voted
24–6
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Aug 25, 2010
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican12
50% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Sep 23, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 56. Noes 17. Page 6781.)
lower
Aug 25, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-6-5)
senate
Aug 25, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 22, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 21).
upper
May 27, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
May 13, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (54-4-3)
assembly
Apr 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2076
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2076. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline