Expungement standards.
Summary
Existing law, subject to exceptions, provides that every defendant convicted of a misdemeanor and not granted probation shall, at any time after the lapse of one year from the date of pronouncement of judgment, if he or she has fully complied with and performed the sentence of the court, is not then serving a sentence for any offense and is not under charge of commission of any crime and has, since the pronouncement of judgment, lived an honest and upright life and has conformed to and obeyed the laws of the land, be permitted by the court to withdraw his or her plea of guilty or nolo contendere and enter a plea of not guilty, or if he or she has been convicted after a plea of not guilty, the court shall set aside the verdict of guilty, and in either case the court shall thereupon dismiss the accusatory pleading against the defendant, who shall thereafter be released from all penalties and disabilities resulting from the offense of which he or she has been convicted, as specified. The bill would make this relief unavailable for convictions of specified sex offenses that apply if the victim is a child 14 or 15 years of age or a dependent person. This bill would authorize the court, in its discretion and in the interests of justice, to afford a defendant that relief as to other charges to which these provisions apply if, after a lapse of one year from the date of pronouncement of judgment, the defendant has fully complied with his or her sentence, is not currently serving a sentence for any offense, and is not under charge of commission of any crime. This bill would change an obsolete cross-reference that determines which misdemeanors are exempt from dismissal and relief pursuant to these provisions. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 1203.4a of the Penal Code made by AB 2582 that would become operative if both bills are enacted and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2010 · Assembly May 3, 2010
How they voted
23–9
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 37
Aug 19, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican12
66% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 45. Noes 29. Page 6529.)
lower
Aug 19, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-9-5)
senate
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 15, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 15).
upper
May 13, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 3, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-26-4)
assembly
Apr 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (April 14).
lower
Mar 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (March 23).
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2068
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2068. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline