Food stamps: intercounty transfer of benefits.
Summary
Existing law provides for the federal Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) , formerly the Food Stamp Program, under which food stamps are allocated to the state by the federal government and are distributed to eligible households by each county. Existing law provides for the intercounty transfer (ICT) of benefits for recipients of CalWORKs, In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) , or Medi-Cal benefits that move from one county to another within the state, as prescribed. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services to establish a process of intercounty transfer of eligibility for benefits under SNAP when a recipient moves from one county to another within the state. This bill would specify, commencing no later than April 1, 2011, that for recipients of SNAP benefits who are also recipients of CalWORKs benefits, the ICT process utilized for CalWORKs shall be used. This bill would further specify, commencing no later than April 1, 2011, that for recipients of SNAP benefits who are also recipients of Medi-Cal benefits, but not recipients of CalWORKs, the ICT process utilized for Medi-Cal shall be used. This bill would require, commencing no later than July 1, 2011, that for recipients of SNAP benefits who are neither recipients of CalWORKs nor Medi-Cal benefits, an intercounty transfer process be developed, as specified. This bill would specify that upon implementation of the intercounty transfer procedures set forth in the bill, it is the responsibility of the recipient changing residence from one county to another within the state to notify the county currently paying food stamp benefits of the move. This bill would require the recipient's prior county of residence to notify the new county of residence of the recipient's move as soon as the recipient's location in the new county is known. It would require the new county of residence to be responsible for determining the recipient's continued eligibility for benefits under SNAP, but that, to the extent permitted by federal law, the new county of residence would not be required to interview persons in the food stamp household to determine continued eligibility, until the next scheduled recertification or other regularly scheduled interview. This bill would require the department to adopt regulations to implement the bill no later than July 1, 2012, as specified. To the extent that this would increase the duties of county officials who administer public aid programs, including the Medi-Cal program, CalWORKs, and the federal SNAP program, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 17, 2010
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2010 · Assembly May 24, 2010
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 24, 2010
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
10
Committee
11
Amendments
5
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 67. Noes 6. Page 6777.)
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-4)
senate
Aug 24, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 3, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (August 2).
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 23, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 22).
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 24, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-1-15)
assembly
May 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (May 19).
lower
May 6, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 7, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 18, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2018
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2018. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline