County penalties: funding for DNA analysis: expedited processing.
Summary
Existing law, the DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime and Innocence Protection Act, an initiative measure, creates in the State Treasury the state's DNA Identification Fund, and makes its revenue, upon appropriation by the Legislature, available to the Attorney General solely to support DNA testing and to offset the impacts of increased testing. That act also provides for an increase in criminal penalties allocated to state and local government to fund the expansion of DNA collection as required by the act. Existing law allocates 70% of the funds, attributable to that increase in fees, to the state within the first 2 years following the approval of the act; 50% of the funds, attributable to the increase in the fees, to the state in the 3rd year; and thereafter, 25% of the funds, attributable to the increase in the fees, to the state, with the remaining funds allocated to local governments. Existing law provides that any funds remaining in a county's share of the increase in fees may be used for specified purposes, including expenditures made in connection with the processing, analysis, tracking, and storage of DNA crime scene samples from cases in which DNA evidence would be useful in identifying or prosecuting suspects, which includes the procurement of equipment and software for the processing, analysis, tracking, and storage of DNA crime scene samples. This bill would specifically provide that a county's remaining share of funds attributable to the increase in fees as required by the act may, if authorized by a resolution of the board of supervisors, be used by a local sheriff, police, district attorney, or regional state crime laboratory for expenditures and administrative costs made or incurred for utilizing an authorized laboratory for the processing and analysis of forensic identification samples and testimony related to that analysis in order to expedite the analysis of crime scene samples in order to expedite and proceed with a pending criminal action or investigation within that county. The DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime and Innocence Protection Act specifies that its provisions may be amended by the Legislature if the amendment furthers the act and is consistent with the purpose of the act to enhance the use of DNA identification evidence for the purpose of accurate and expeditious crime solving and for exonerating the innocent. This bill also contains the Legislature's finding that this bill furthers, and is consistent with, the purpose of the DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime and Innocence Protection Act to enhance the use of DNA identification evidence for the purpose of accurate and expeditious crime solving and for exonerating the innocent by accelerating the testing of DNA samples that cannot be handled in an expeditious manner without the use of an outside laboratory.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Apr 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 17, 2010
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 9, 2010 · Assembly Aug 12, 2010
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 37
Aug 9, 2010
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 12, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-1)
assembly
Aug 12, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6157.)
lower
Aug 9, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-4)
senate
Aug 9, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 16, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 7, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 29, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (March 23).
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 18, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DL
Dan Logue
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2009
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2009. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline