Vehicles: video event recorder.
Summary
Existing law prohibits any person, except as specified, from driving any motor vehicle with any object or material placed, displayed, installed, affixed, or applied in or upon the vehicle that obstructs or reduces the driver's clear view through the windshield or side windows. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime. This bill would additionally exempt from these provisions a video event recorder, as defined, that has the capability of monitoring driver performance, which may be mounted in a 7-inch square in the lower corner of the windshield farthest removed from the driver, in a 5-inch square in the lower corner of the windshield nearest to the driver and outside of an airbag deployment zone, or in a 5-inch square mounted to the center uppermost portion of the interior of the windshield. The bill would also require, among other things, that a vehicle equipped with a video event recorder have a notice posted in a visible location which states that a passenger's conversation may be recorded. Because this bill would create a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require video event recorders to store no more than 30 seconds before and after a triggering event. If a person is driving for hire in a vehicle with a video event recorder, the bill would require the person's employer to provide, upon request, unedited copies of the recording to the person, free of charge, and within 5 days of the request. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 17, 2010
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 26, 2010 · Assembly May 17, 2010
How they voted
26–4
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Aug 26, 2010
D
Democratic23
65% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
6
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 71. Noes 5. Page 6875.)
lower
Aug 30, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 26, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-4-5)
senate
Aug 9, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 3, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 22, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 27, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 17, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (54-1-6)
assembly
Apr 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 26, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 19).
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 18, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1942
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1942. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline