Retirement: local employees.
Summary
The Public Employees' Retirement Law creates the Public Employees' Retirement System, which provides a defined benefit to its members based on age at retirement, service credit, and final compensation, as defined. The State Teachers' Retirement Law and the retirement laws for county employees and city employees also provide for a defined benefit based on age at retirement, service credit, and final compensation. Existing law requires the California Citizens Compensation Commission to establish the annual salary and the medical, dental, insurance, and other similar benefits of state officers. This bill would specify that, notwithstanding any other law, for the purposes of determining a retirement benefit paid to a person who first becomes a member of a public retirement system on or after January 1, 2011, the maximum salary or payrate upon which retirement benefits shall be based shall not exceed 125% of the salary recommended by the California Citizens Compensation Commission to be paid to the Governor of the State of California, effective December 7, 2009. The bill would require that this amount be adjusted annually based on changes in the All Urban California Consumer Price Index. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 2, 2009
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2010 · Assembly May 4, 2009
How they voted
24–9
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 30, 2010
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican12
66% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6945.)
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 31).
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 31, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 30, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-9-2)
senate
Aug 30, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 30, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 30, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Aug 27, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 23, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
May 14, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 4, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-0-24)
assembly
Mar 31, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Feb 3, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
AT
Alberto Torrico
DDemocratic
Co
HD
Hector De La Torre
DDemocratic
Co
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
Co
NT
Norma Torres
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 194
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 194. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline