Real property: common interest developments.
Summary
The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act provides for the creation and regulation of common interest developments. Under existing law, a common interest development is managed by an association pursuant to the provisions of the governing documents of the development. This bill would provide that any provision that is added to or included in a governing document initially recorded on or after January 1, 2011, that prohibits the rental or lease of a separate interest is void, unless the provision imposing the prohibition is approved by the owners of separate interests, as provided. Existing law requires that an owner of a separate interest in a common interest development provide certain items to a prospective purchaser prior to transfer of title. This bill would also require the owner of a separate interest, when a governing document prohibits the rental or leasing of all or any of the separate interests, to provide a statement describing the prohibition. This bill would also incorporate additional changes to Section 1368 of the Civil Code, as proposed by SB 1128, to be operative only if SB 1128 and this bill are both enacted, each bill amends Section 1368 of the Civil Code, and this bill is enacted after SB 1128.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Apr 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 17, 2010
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 11, 2010 · Assembly Apr 29, 2010
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 38
Aug 11, 2010
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
7
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 16, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 6222.)
lower
Aug 11, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-4)
senate
Aug 11, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 13 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 15).
upper
Jun 9, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 24, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 13, 2010
Committee
Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and JUD.
upper
Apr 29, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-6)
assembly
Apr 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 20, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 19, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 14).
lower
Mar 18, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 10, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Mar 9, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Committee
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD.
lower
Feb 18, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Knight
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1927
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1927. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline