AB 1905 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Foster care: funding: placement approvals.

Summary
Existing law establishes the Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) program, under which counties provide payments to foster care providers on behalf of qualified children in foster care. The program is funded by a combination of federal, state, and county funds. Existing law requires a child to be placed in one of 8 placement categories in order to be eligible for AFDC-FC payments, including the approved home of a relative or a nonrelative extended family member. In addition, existing law requires, except as specified, that the standards used to determine suitability of relative and nonrelative extended family member placements be the same standards set forth in the regulations for the licensing of foster family homes. Existing law, the California Community Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of community care and residential facilities by the State Department of Social Services, including specified inspection authority for specific categories of facilities, including licensed foster family homes. Existing law excludes relative and nonrelative extended family member placements from the act. However, existing law also requires, with specified exceptions, that the standards used to determine suitability of relative and nonrelative extended family member placements be the same standards set forth in the regulations for the licensing of foster family homes. The Community Care Facilities Act requires every licensed community care facility to be subject to unannounced visits by the department, as often as necessary to ensure the quality of care provided. This bill would require, subject to specified conditions, the approval of an approved home of a relative or nonrelative extended family member for which an annual visit to ensure the quality of care provided is pending, to remain in full force and effect, and would prohibit payment to the approved home of a relative or nonrelative extended family member from being delayed or terminated solely due to late completion of the annual visit. Existing law continuously appropriates moneys from the General Fund to pay for the state's share of AFDC-FC costs. This bill would declare that no appropriation would be made for purposes of the bill. By increasing duties of counties administering the AFDC-FC program, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Apr 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 16, 2010 Signed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2010 · Assembly Aug 23, 2010

How they voted

280
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 34
Aug 20, 2010
D Democratic23
21 Yea 2
91% Yea
R Republican11
7 Yea 4
63% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Sep 30, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-2)
assembly
Aug 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6484.)
lower
Aug 20, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-0-6)
senate
Aug 20, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and to Consent Calendar.
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) (June 10).
upper
Jun 1, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 6, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Apr 14, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 14).
lower
Mar 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 23).
lower
Mar 18, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Mar 17, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors

Sponsors