Pregnant inmates and wards: least restrictive restraints.
Summary
Existing law requires the Corrections Standards Authority to establish minimum standards for state and local correctional facilities, including standards restricting the shackling of women in labor, during childbirth, and while in recovery after giving birth, and to review those standards biennially and make any appropriate revisions, as specified. This bill would require that the standards ensure that women who are pregnant shall not be shackled by the wrists, ankles, or both during any transport, during labor, during delivery, and while in recovery after giving birth, except that the least restrictive restraints possible may be used when deemed necessary for the inmate, consistent with the legitimate security needs of the inmate, the staff, and the public. The bill would require the authority to develop these standards regarding the shackling of pregnant women as part of its biennial review of its standards. Under existing law, pregnant inmates of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, wards of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Facilities, and wards in the custody of a local juvenile facility, are to be transported in the least restrictive way possible when being taken to a hospital for purposes of childbirth. This bill would prohibit inmates and wards of these facilities who are known to be pregnant from being shackled by the wrists, ankles, or both during any transport, during labor, during delivery, and while in recovery after giving birth, unless deemed necessary for the safety and security of the inmate or ward, the staff, and the public. If restraints are deemed necessary during labor, delivery, recovery after birth, or transport, this bill would allow the person to be restrained in the least restrictive way possible, consistent with the legitimate security needs of each inmate or ward, the staff, and the public.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jul 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 16, 2010
Vetoed Sep 25, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2010 · Assembly May 20, 2010
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 38
Aug 23, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
11
Committee
9
Amendments
7
Sep 25, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 6572.)
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-4)
senate
Aug 23, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 11, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 10, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 2).
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 30, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 20, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-0-6)
assembly
May 18, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 17, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 12).
lower
May 4, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 3, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 6).
lower
Mar 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1900
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1900. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline