Judges: disqualification.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a party or attorney in an action or proceeding to move to disqualify a judge, court commissioner, or referee for prejudice against a party or attorney or the interest of a party or attorney, as specified. Prejudice may be established by an oral or written motion without notice supported by affidavit or declaration under penalty of perjury, or an oral statement under oath, that the judge, court commissioner, or referee is prejudiced against a party or attorney, or the interest of the party or attorney, so that the party or attorney cannot, or believes that he or she cannot, have a fair and impartial trial or hearing. Existing law specifies the period during which the motion is required to be made for specified trials and hearings, including, for the trial of a cause that has been assigned to a judge for all purposes, the motion shall be made to the assigned judge or to the presiding judge by a party within 10 days after notice of the all purpose assignment, or if the party has not yet appeared in the action, then within 10 days after the appearance. This bill would extend the time period for making the motion in the trial of a civil cause that has been assigned to a judge for all purposes from the 10-day period described above to a 15-day period. The bill would require a party to a civil action making a motion pursuant to these provisions to serve notice on all parties no later than 5 days after making the motion. The bill would make other technical and conforming changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Apr 2010
Senate Passage
Jul 2010
Signed into Law
Aug 2010
Introduced Feb 16, 2010
Signed Aug 13, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jul 1, 2010 · Assembly Apr 22, 2010
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Jul 1, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
4
Amendments
5
Aug 13, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 2, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 5992.)
lower
Jul 1, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-4)
senate
Jul 1, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 8 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (June 22).
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 6, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 22, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-0-4)
assembly
Apr 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (April 6).
lower
Feb 25, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1894
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1894. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline