Restitution orders.
Summary
Existing law provides for victim restitution orders and restitution fines, as specified. Existing law authorizes procedures for the entry and application of court orders for income deduction upon entry of an order for a restitution fine or for victim restitution, and gives the agency responsible for the collection of restitution specified powers and duties in regard to these income deduction orders. The bill would provide that if there is no agency in the county responsible for the collection of restitution, the county probation office or the prosecuting attorney may carry out the functions and duties of such an agency in regard to the income deduction orders described above, as specified. This bill would further provide, if the defendant fails to meet his or her obligations under the restitution order and the defendant has not provided good cause for the failure, that a court shall be authorized, upon the request of the prosecuting attorney, to order the prosecuting attorney be given authority to use lien procedures applicable to the defendant, including, but not limited to, a writ of attachment of property, as specified. This bill would provide prosecutorial immunity from liability for these proceedings and deny reimbursement for the costs of the prosecuting attorney from the defendant's income or assets, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 12, 2010
Signed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2010 · Assembly May 13, 2010
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 38
Aug 23, 2010
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican13
76% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
10
Committee
7
Amendments
6
Sep 30, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6628.)
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
Passed on file.
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-7)
senate
Aug 23, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 30, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 29).
upper
May 27, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 13, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-1-2)
assembly
May 11, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 10, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 19, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 25, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD. by unanimous consent, and then be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 25, 2010
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
lower
Feb 16, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WT
Warren T Furutani
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1847
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1847. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline