Public officials: personal information.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires a person, business, or association, upon receiving the written demand of an elected or appointed official, to remove the official's home address or telephone number from public display on the Internet within 48 hours of the delivery of the demand, and to continue to ensure that information is not reposted on the same Internet Web site, a subsidiary site, or any other Internet Web site maintained by the recipient of the written demand, with specified exceptions. Existing law includes a public safety official within the definition of an elected or appointed official for these purposes, and defines public safety official to include specified peace officer classifications. Existing law makes a violation of these provisions a misdemeanor or a felony under certain circumstances. This bill would specify that the requirement to remove the information described above from public display on the Internet includes information provided to cellular telephone applications. The bill would also expand the definition of public safety officer for these purposes, and include within that definition retired members of specified employee classifications. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law provides that a person who maliciously, with the intent to obstruct justice or the administration of the laws, or with the intent to inflict physical harm, discloses the residence address or telephone number of public safety officials, as defined, or that of the spouse or children of these persons, is guilty of a misdemeanor. A violation of these provisions that results in bodily harm to the public safety official, or the spouse or child of that person, is a felony. The bill would expand the definition of public safety officer for these purposes, and include within that definition retired members of specified employee classifications. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (3) Upon adoption by a county board of supervisors, existing law requires a county elections official to make confidential certain personal information of a public safety officer, upon application by the public safety officer made under penalty of perjury. The bill would expand the definition of public safety officer for these purposes, and include within that definition retired members of specified employee classifications. By increasing the duties of local officials, and expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Aug 2010
Introduced Feb 11, 2010
Signed Aug 27, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 9, 2010 · Assembly May 6, 2010
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 38
Aug 9, 2010
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Aug 27, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 9, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-4)
senate
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 22, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 22).
upper
May 20, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 6, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-5)
assembly
Apr 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 28).
lower
Apr 19, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 15, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 6).
lower
Mar 23, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 22, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 25, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 12, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 14.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1813
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1813. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline