Redevelopment: Fort Ord Reuse Plan: project area territory.
Summary
Existing law, known as the Fort Ord Reuse Authority Act, authorizes specified local agencies in Monterey County to establish the Fort Ord Reuse Authority to prepare, adopt, finance, and implement a plan for future use and development of the territory occupied by the Fort Ord military base in Monterey County. Existing law authorizes a city or county redevelopment agency to establish a project area that includes territory within the jurisdiction of the city or county that is also within the territory of Fort Ord, but only pursuant to the provisions of the act. Existing law also prohibits a redevelopment agency from providing any form of direct assistance to a development that will be or is on a parcel of land which has not been previously developed for urban use and that will generate sales or use tax, except as specified. This bill would exempt the territory within a project area added pursuant to the Fort Ord Reuse Authority Act from the prohibition if the redevelopment agency, prior to establishing the project area, adopts a resolution making specified findings and if the territory is designated as having a specified use.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Apr 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 10, 2010
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2010 · Assembly Apr 29, 2010
How they voted
21–14
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 38
Aug 24, 2010
D
Democratic25
76% Yea
R
Republican13
76% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
6
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 25, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 59. Noes 17. Page 6655.)
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-14-3)
senate
Aug 24, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 22, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jun 21, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 16).
upper
Jun 9, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 24, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 13, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Apr 29, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-14-11)
assembly
Apr 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 13, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 25, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 11, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1791
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1791. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline