Water development projects: state financial assistance.
Summary
Existing law provides for state cooperation with the federal government in the construction of specified flood control projects. For certain flood control projects authorized on or after January 1, 2002, or for which specified findings have been made on or after that date, the act requires the state to pay 50% of specified nonfederal costs. Existing law authorizes the state to pay up to 70% of those nonfederal costs upon the recommendation of the Department of Water Resources or the Central Valley Flood Protection Board if either entity determines that the project will advance one of several objectives. Those objectives include increasing the level of flood protection within the benefitted area of the project if that area has a median household income that is less than 120% of the poverty level, as defined by the Department of Finance. This bill, instead, would authorize the state to pay up to 70% of those nonfederal costs upon the recommendation of the department or the board if either entity determines that the project will increase the level of flood protection for disadvantaged communities, as defined.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 10, 2010
Signed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2010 · Assembly Jun 1, 2010
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 37
Aug 19, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Sep 30, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6472.)
lower
Aug 19, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-3)
senate
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 12).
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jul 1, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jun 1, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-1)
assembly
May 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 23).
lower
Feb 18, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
lower
Feb 11, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
MY
Mariko Yamada
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1788
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1788. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline