AB 1772 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Vehicles: group axle weight exemption: idle reduction technology.

Summary
(1) Existing law imposes a maximum gross vehicle weight limit on a vehicle or combination of vehicles based on the number of axles of the vehicle or combination of vehicles. Existing law authorizes the Department of Transportation to fix the maximum weight limit of a vehicle operating on a highway after the department makes specified determinations. Existing law authorizes, with specified exemptions, a city, county, or city and county to prohibit the use of a street by a vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight limit the city, county, or city and county has established according to prescribed requirements by ordinance. Existing law authorizes the department, and a city or county satisfying specified criteria, to establish the gross vehicle weight that a bridge or other structure will sustain safely. This bill would authorize a vehicle subject to those provisions that is equipped with idle reduction technology to exceed the group axle weight limit by the weight of the idle reduction technology, as defined, or not more than 400 pounds, whichever is less. The bill would require a vehicle operator, upon request, to provide proof that the idle technology is fully functional at all times and the excess weight is not for any purpose other than for the use of the idle reduction technology. Because a violation of this requirement would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 9, 2010 Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2010

How they voted

66–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 69
Jun 1, 2010
D Democratic42
40 Yea 2
95% Yea
I Independent1
1 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican26
25 Yea 1
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
17
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Aug 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 23, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 22).
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Jun 1, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-3)
assembly
May 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 5).
lower
Feb 18, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 10, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TM
Tony Mendoza
DDemocratic
CA
32