In-home supportive services.
Summary
Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law permits services to be provided under the IHSS program either through the employment of individual providers, a contract between the county and an entity for the provision of services, the creation by the county of a public authority, or a contract between the county and a nonprofit consortium. Existing law requires that criminal background checks be conducted for prospective and existing IHSS providers. Under existing law, if an applicant or provider is rejected as a result of information in a criminal background report, the applicant or provider shall receive a copy of the report to review the information for accuracy and completeness. Existing law requires the applicant or provider to be advised of his or her right to submit a formal challenge, as specified, if the applicant or provider finds information in the report to be inaccurate or incomplete. This bill would revise the above provisions, including deleting the individual's right to formally challenge the information in the criminal record report, and to waive specified fees associated with obtain a copy of the report. This bill would specify that an individual's criminal offender record information search response shall not be made available to any other individual, and requiring a public authority or nonprofit consortium to provide thee information in such a manner as to protect the confidentiality and privacy of the individual that is the subject of the information. The bill would require the public authority or nonprofit consortium to retain a copy of each individual's criminal offender record search response, and record the dates that copies of the response were provided to the individual and the department. To the extent that these procedures would impose additional duties on counties administering the IHSS program, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. This bill, with respect to a person who seeks to become an IHSS provider and who is not listed on a registry, would permit 2 or more adjacent or contiguous counties, or public authorities or nonprofit consortia within those counties, to agree to designate one county, public authority, or nonprofit consortium to send fingerprints to the Department of Justice for a criminal background check, to receive responses from the Department of Justice, and to maintain common lists of persons eligible for employment, as prescribed. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 9, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 3, 2010
How they voted
50–21
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 73
Jun 3, 2010
D
Democratic46
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican26
76% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Aug 18, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 17, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (August 12).
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 23, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 22).
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and PUB. S.
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (50-21-2)
assembly
May 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 28, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 18, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 10, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1763
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1763. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline