AB 1747 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Environmental quality: development projects: mineral deposits.

Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA requires that all public agencies adopt by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation, objectives, criteria, and procedures for the evaluation of projects and the preparation of environmental impact reports and negative declarations pursuant to the act. This bill would require a lead agency, if a proposed residential, retail, or commercial development project would preclude or substantially and directly impede the present or potential future use of lands for mineral extraction in an area that has received a specified classification by the State Geologist as containing mineral deposits of statewide or regional significance, to determine whether those impacts may have a significant effect on the environment, including, but not limited to, any significant effect on air quality. By imposing new duties on a lead agency with respect to determining whether certain development projects may have a significant effect on the environment, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 8, 2010 Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 20, 2010

How they voted

59–0
Passed · 10 other
Total votes 69
May 20, 2010
D Democratic42
39 Yea 3
92% Yea
I Independent1
1
0% Nay
R Republican26
20 Yea 6
76% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
14
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 20, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (59-0-10)
assembly
Apr 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 15, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (April 5).
lower
Feb 18, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 9, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors

Sponsors