Biologics: animal blood and blood component products: commercial blood banks for animals.
Summary
Existing law defines biologics, requires the Secretary of Food and Agriculture to license biologic establishments that meet specified requirements, provides requirements relating to the application for a biologic license, and requires a certain biologic license application fee and license renewal fee. A violation of these provisions is a crime. This bill would revise the definition of biologics, prohibit a person from engaging in the production of animal blood and blood component products, as defined, for retail sale and distribution except in a commercial blood bank for animals, as defined, licensed by the secretary, delete the requirement that the secretary license biologic establishments and instead require the secretary to license commercial blood banks for animals that meet specified requirements, and revise the license application provisions and license application fee and renewal fee provisions to instead make them applicable to producers of animal blood and blood component products. Because this bill would change the definition of an existing crime and create new crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law prohibits a person from engaging in the production of biologics except in an establishment licensed by the United States Department of Agriculture or the Secretary of Food and Agriculture or in an establishment producing biologics only for use by the owner or operator for animals owned by him or her. This bill would instead prohibit a person from engaging in the production of biologics except as permitted under federal law. Existing law prohibits the offer for sale or use of any biologic unless it is registered by the secretary, except that registration is not required of any biologic manufactured pursuant to the terms of a valid license issued by the United States Department of Agriculture unless the secretary finds that, due to local conditions, it is necessary that the biologic be registered. This bill would, instead, prohibit the offer for sale or use of any biologic unless it is manufactured pursuant to the terms of a valid license or permit issued by the United States Department of Agriculture. The bill would also prohibit the offer for sale or use of any blood or blood component product unless it is produced in an establishment licensed by the secretary, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. Existing law requires the secretary to register any biologic that meets certain requirements and a biologic that is produced in an establishment exempt from licensing and that meets certain requirements, provides requirements relating to the application for registration of a biologic, and authorizes the secretary to impose conditions on the production or use of biologics. This bill would delete the requirement that the secretary register biologics and instead require the secretary to register blood or blood component products that meet certain requirements. The bill would also require an application for registration of blood or blood component products to include specified information and would authorize the secretary to impose conditions on the production or use of blood or blood component products. Existing law provides various enforcement provisions that the secretary may undertake with respect to biologic licensees and registrants. This bill would revise those enforcement provisions to instead make them applicable to commercial blood banks for animals licensees and registrants of blood or blood component products. This bill would make other conforming, clarifying, and technical changes. This bill would state that its provisions are declaratory of existing law as applied to commercial blood banks for animals. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would provide that its provisions shall not become operative until the first day on or after January 1, 2013, that all Californiabiological products registered with the Department of Food and Agriculture by December 31, 2010, have obtained a United States Veterinary Biological Product License from the United States Department of Agriculture Center for Veterinary Biologics except those products for which the Department of Food and Agriculture has received written documentation from a firm that the firm has chosen not to obtain that license. The bill would require the Department of Food and Agriculture to assist, as provided, toward federal biological products licensure. The bill would also require the Department of Food and Agriculture to submit a report to the Legislature on the status of biologics transitioning to federal biological products licensure by June 1, 2011, and every June thereafter until this act becomes operative and, when it does become operative, to post that fact on its Internet Web site.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 2, 2010
Signed Sep 24, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2010 · Assembly Aug 23, 2010
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 37
Aug 20, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican12
66% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
6
Sep 23, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-2)
assembly
Aug 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6482.)
lower
Aug 20, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-6)
senate
Aug 20, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and to Consent Calendar.
upper
Jun 15, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 15).
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on F. & A.
upper
May 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 12).
lower
May 6, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 20, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 19, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 14).
lower
Apr 6, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Feb 3, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CC
Connie Conway
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1709
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1709. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline