Human trafficking.
Summary
Existing law, the California Control of Profits of Organized Crime Act, provides the procedure for the forfeiture of property acquired through a pattern of criminal profiteering activity and for the forfeiture of the proceeds of a pattern of criminal profiteering activity, as specified, and requires the prosecution to file a petition for forfeiture in conjunction with certain criminal charges. Under existing law, criminal profiteering activity is defined to include specified crimes. This bill would include abduction or procurement by fraudulent inducement for prostitution within the definition of criminal profiteering activity, as specified. Under the California Control of Profits of Organized Crime Act, in all cases where property is forfeited and, if necessary, sold by the Department of General Services or a local governmental entity, the money forfeited or the proceeds of sale are required to be distributed by the state or local governmental entity in accordance with certain procedures, including to the general fund of the state or local governmental entity, whichever prosecutes. The bill would specify that in any case involving human trafficking of minors for purposes of prostitution or lewd conduct, or in any case involving abduction or procurement by fraudulent inducement for prostitution, in lieu of the distribution procedure described above, the proceeds shall be deposited in the Victim-Witness Assistance Fund to be available for appropriation to fund child sexual exploitation and child sexual abuse victim counseling centers and prevention programs. The bill would also require 50% of the funds deposited in the Victim-Witness Assistance Fund pursuant to this new requirement to be granted to community-based organizations that serve minor victims of human trafficking. Existing law authorizes the sentencing court to impose an additional fine of up to $5,000 on any person convicted of pimping, pandering, or procurement of a child under 16 years of age, as specified. Existing law provides that every fine imposed and collected for a person convicted of pimping, pandering, or procurement of a child under 16 years of age be deposited in the Victim-Witness Assistance Fund to be available for appropriation to the California Emergency Management Agency for grants to child exploitation and child sexual abuse victim counseling centers and prevention programs. This bill would increase the maximum amount of additional authorized fine to $20,000 for any person convicted of procurement of a child under 16 years of age, as specified. The bill would also authorize the court to order a defendant convicted of abducting a person under 18 years of age for the purpose of prostitution to pay an additional fine of $20,000. The bill would require that 50% of those fines collected and deposited in the Victim-Witness Assistance Fund pursuant to these provisions, including the fine authorized in the bill for abducting a minor for the purpose of prostitution, be granted to community-based organizations that serve minor victims of human trafficking. Because this bill would increase the penalty for an existing crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Dec 1, 2008
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly Jun 3, 2009
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 39
Aug 31, 2009
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican14
85% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
12
Committee
10
Amendments
9
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2924.)
lower
Sep 1, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 31, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-4)
senate
Aug 24, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 14).
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 3, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-3)
assembly
Jun 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 29, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
May 20, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 6, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 4, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 23, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 5, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Dec 2, 2008
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 1.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SS
Sandré Swanson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 17
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 17. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline