School employees: scope of representation.
Summary
(1) Existing law gives public school employee organizations the right to represent their members in their employment relations with public school employers, and limits the scope of representation to matters relating to wages, hours of employment, and other terms and conditions of employment, as defined. Existing law provides that subjects other than those specified may not be included as part of collective bargaining. This bill would require public school employers to give reasonable written notice to the exclusive representative of classified personnel of a public school employer's intent to make any change to matters within the scope of representation, including, but not necessarily limited to, start time. The bill would also require public school employers to provide a recognized employee organization with the opportunity to meet and negotiate with the public school employer. The bill would require, in cases of emergency when the public school employer determines that a rule, policy, or procedure must be adopted immediately, that the public school employer give this notice and opportunity to meet and negotiate at the earliest practicable time following the adoption of the rule, policy, or procedure. This bill would also make various nonsubstantive technical and conforming changes. Because the bill would impose new duties on public school employers, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 20, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 3, 2010
How they voted
45–27
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 73
Jun 3, 2010
D
Democratic46
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican26
96% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-27-1)
assembly
May 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 28, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 5, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 17, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
lower
Mar 16, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Jan 27, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
lower
Jan 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SS
Sandré Swanson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1665
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1665. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline