Fur products: labeling.
Summary
Existing federal law requires that fur products be labeled with the names of any animals used, manufacturer, country of origin, and other specified information. Fur products with a relatively small quantity or value of fur that is worth $150 or less are exempt from these labeling requirements. This bill, commencing September 1, 2011, would prohibit the sale or display for sale of any coat, jacket, garment, or other clothing apparel made wholly or partially of fur, regardless of the price of the apparel or the amount or value of the fur contained therein, without having attached thereto and conspicuously displayed a tag or label including the names of the animals from which the fur was acquired and the country of origin of any imported furs. Used articles of clothing would be exempt from these labeling requirements. The bill would provide that any violation of the labeling requirements is subject to a civil penalty of not more than $500 for the first violation, and not more than $1,000 for each subsequent violation, except as specified.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Apr 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Jan 15, 2010
Vetoed Sep 25, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 11, 2010 · Assembly Apr 5, 2010
How they voted
21–11
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 37
Aug 11, 2010
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 25, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 11, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-11-5)
senate
Jun 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 15).
upper
Apr 29, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 5, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (51-10-8)
assembly
Mar 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Mar 22, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 16).
lower
Mar 4, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 3, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 2, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 1, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jan 27, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jan 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 18.
lower
1 primary · 6 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1656
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1656. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline