Vehicles: driving-under-the-influence (DUI): repeat offenders.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires, if a person is convicted of a specified driving-under-the-influence (DUI) offense and the offense occurred within 10 years of 2, or 3 or more, prior specified DUI offenses that resulted in a conviction, that the person be punished by enhanced penalties, and that the person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle be revoked by the department for a period of 2, 3, 4, or 5 years, as applicable. Existing law authorizes the court to impose specified additional orders on a person when the person is convicted of a driving-under-the-influence (DUI) offense, depending on the circumstances. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2012, authorize the court to order a 10-year revocation of the driver's license of a person who has been convicted of 3 or more specified DUI offenses if the court considers certain factors, including, but not limited to, the period of time that has elapsed since his or her previous DUI convictions. The bill would also authorize a person who had his or her driver's license revoked for 10 years to apply to the Department of Motor Vehicles, 5 years from the date of the last DUI conviction, to have his or her privilege to operate a motor vehicle reinstated subject to certain conditions, including, among other things, the condition that the person was not convicted of any other drug- or alcohol-related offenses, under state law, during the driver's license revocation period. (2) Existing law requires that a person, convicted of driving under the influence, without bodily injury to another, within 10 years of being convicted of a separate violation of one or more specified DUI offenses, be punished by his or her driving privilege being suspended or revoked for a period of 2 or more years. Existing law requires, among other things, the Department of Motor Vehicles to advise a person, who was only under the influence of an alcoholic beverage at the time of the violation, that he or she may apply for a restricted driver's license after completion of 90 days, 6 months, or 12 months, of the suspension or revocation period, or if the person was under the influence of any drug or the combination of any drug and alcohol, or if the person concurrently did any act forbidden by law or neglected any duty imposed by law that proximately caused bodily injury to another person other than the driver, then after completion of 12 months of the revocation period, which may include credit for a specified concurrent suspension, subject to specified conditions. This bill would revise and recast the above provisions to make technical and nonsubstantive, as well as conforming, changes as a result of the changes made by Chapter 193 of the Statutes of 2009 (SB 598) .
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Jan 4, 2010
Signed Sep 27, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2010 · Assembly Jun 2, 2010
How they voted
28–1
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 34
Aug 19, 2010
D
Democratic23
78% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
8
Sep 25, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6469.)
lower
Aug 19, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-1-5)
senate
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 21 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 17, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 16, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 12).
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 2, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-3)
assembly
May 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 28, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 14, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (March 23).
lower
Feb 8, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 4, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Jan 14, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 5, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 4.
lower
1 primary · 23 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Co
Abel Maldonado
RRepublican
Co
AH
Alyson Huber
DDemocratic
Co
AS
Audra Strickland
RRepublican
Co
BB
Bill Berryhill
RRepublican
Co
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Co
BB
Bob Blumenfield
DDemocratic
Co
CS
Cameron Smyth
RRepublican
Co
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Co
DD
Danny D Gilmore
RRepublican
Co
Dave Cox
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1601
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1601. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline