Local agencies: spheres of influence.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires a Local Agency Formation Commission to develop and determine the sphere of influence of each local governmental agency within the county. A commission is authorized, at the time a commission approves a proposal for an incorporation or a reorganization which includes an incorporation, to determine the sphere of influence for the proposed new city. The commission is required to determine the sphere of influence for any newly incorporated city within one year of the effective date of incorporation. This bill would authorize a commission, beginning January 1, 2010, to determine the sphere of influence for a proposed new district, when a commission approves a formation or reorganization that includes the formation of a district. The commission would be required to determine the sphere of influence for any newly formed district within one year of the effective date of formation. (2) The Cortese‑Knox‑Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 governs the procedures for the formation and change of organization of cities and special districts. In the case of a petition for an annexation, a detachment, or a reorganization consisting solely of annexations or detachments, or both, signed by all of the landowners in the territory affected by the proposal, the commission may approve or disapprove the proposal without notice or hearing, if prescribed conditions are met. With respect to uninhabited territory, the commission may waive protest proceedings if all the owners of land have given written consent and no subject agency has submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest. This bill would, with respect to uninhabited territory, additionally permit the commission to waive protest proceedings in the case of private railroad companies, if no private railroad company owners of land have submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest before the conclusion of the commission hearing and no subject agency has submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest. (3) Existing law permits any owner of land or registered voter within inhabited territory proposed to be annexed or detached, or any owner of land within uninhabited territory proposed to be annexed or detached, to file a written protest against the annexation or detachment at any time prior to the conclusion of the noticed protest. The written protest is required to include the name and address of the owner of the land affected and the street address or other description sufficient to identify the location of the land or the name and address of the registered voter as it appears on the affidavit of registration. This bill would repeal the requirement that the written protest include that information and would instead require the written protest to contain the same information that is required in a petition that proposes a change or organization or reorganization. The bill would additionally require the commission to determine the value of written protests in accordance with those petition requirements, and would make other technical changes. (4) Existing law requires the expenses incurred in conducting elections for a change of organization or reorganization to be paid in a specified manner. This bill would make technical conforming changes to that provision.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Signed into Law
Aug 2009
Introduced Mar 31, 2009
Signed Aug 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 24, 2009 · Assembly Jul 6, 2009
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
Jun 24, 2009
D
Democratic25
100% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Aug 5, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 6, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-2)
assembly
Jul 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2383.)
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (40-0)
senate
Jun 24, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 17, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (June 17).
upper
Jun 10, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 13).
lower
May 7, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 6, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee May 1.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1582
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1582. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline