Telecommunications: universal service: deaf and disabled telecommunications programs.
Summary
Existing law, the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, establishes a program of cooperative federalism for the regulation of telecommunications to attain the goal of local competition, while implementing specific, predictable, and sufficient federal and state mechanisms to preserve and advance universal service, consistent with certain universal service principles. Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including telephone corporations. Existing law requires the commission to oversee administration of the state's universal service programs, including the deaf and disabled programs. The existing deaf and disabled universal service program, among other things, requires the commission to design and implement a program to provide a telecommunications device capable of serving the needs of individuals who are deaf or hearing impaired, together with a single party line, at no charge additional to the basic exchange rate, to any subscriber who is certified as an individual who is deaf or hearing impaired. Existing law requires the commission, with certain exceptions, until January 1, 2010, to establish a rate recovery mechanism through a surcharge not to exceed 0.5% applied to a subscriber's intrastate telephone service, to allow providers of equipment and service pursuant to the state's deaf and disabled universal service programs to recover costs as they are incurred. Existing law requires the commission to annually review the surcharge level and the balances in the funds established to fund the state's deaf and disabled universal service programs and, until January 1, 2010, authorize the commission to make any necessary adjustments to the surcharge to ensure that the deaf and disabled universal service programs are adequately funded and the fund balances are not excessive. This bill would instead make January 1, 2014, the termination date for the requirements placed on the commission relative to funding of the deaf and disabled universal service programs. Existing law makes any public utility and any corporation other than a public utility that fails to comply with any part of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission guilty of a crime. Because the program that is extended under the provisions of this bill require a decision or order of the commission to implement, and violation of the order or decision would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by extending the operation of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2009
Committee Review
Sep 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Mar 10, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 2, 2009 · Assembly Sep 10, 2009
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 36
Sep 2, 2009
D
Democratic23
78% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
5
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (51-5-6)
assembly
Sep 10, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 68. Noes 6. Page 3271.)
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (September 9).
lower
Sep 4, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 3, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 5 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-7)
senate
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 17).
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 16, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 7).
upper
Jun 30, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 12, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 11).
lower
Apr 20, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Mar 11, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee April 11.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FF
Felipe Fuentes
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1553
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1553. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline