Electricity: resource adequacy distributed generation program.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. Existing law requires the commission, in consultation with the Independent System Operator (ISO) , to establish resource adequacy requirements for all load-serving entities, as defined, in accordance with specified objectives. This definition of a "load-serving entity" excludes a local publicly owned electric utility. However, other provisions of existing law require that each local publicly owned electric utility serving end-use customers prudently plan for and procure resources that are adequate to meet its planning reserve margin and peak demand and operating reserves, sufficient to provide reliable electric service to its customers. This bill would authorize an eligible customer-generator, as defined, to participate in resource adequacy distributed generation, as specified. The bill would require each responsible load-serving entity, as defined, to develop a standard offer contract for the purchase of electricity generated by an eligible facility, as defined, of an eligible customer-generator participating in resource adequacy distributed generation, and would require that the standard offer contract provide for payment for every kilowatthour delivered to the electrical grid by the eligible facility at the generation rate of the responsible load-serving entity. The bill would require that the commission approve, or approve as modified, the standard offer contract of a responsible load-serving entity that is an electrical corporation, electric service provider, or community choice aggregator, and would similarly require that the governing board approve, or approve as modified, the standard offer contract of a responsible load-serving entity that is a local publicly owned electric utility. The bill would authorize an electrical corporation or local publicly owned electric utility to offer resource adequacy distributed generation pursuant to a tariff, and would authorize the tariff to be offered in lieu of, or in addition to, the standard offer contract. The bill would require every responsible load-serving entity, upon approval of its standard offer contract or tariff, to make the standard offer contract or tariff available to eligible customer-generators within its service territory, or for an electric service provider, to any eligible customer-generator with which it has entered into a direct transaction. The bill would impose additional requirements upon responsible load-serving entities, the commission, and the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility for implementation of the resource adequacy distributed generation program. The bill would provide that the physical generating capacity of the eligible facility available to the responsible load-serving entity pursuant to the program shall count toward the resource adequacy requirements of those entities. (2) Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would require action by the commission to implement, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. Because this bill would establish various requirements to be met by local publicly owned utilities, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jan 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 28, 2009
How they voted
61–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 62
May 28, 2009
D
Democratic38
100% Yea
R
Republican24
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
8
Committee
12
Amendments
10
Jun 3, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jan 11, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jan 7, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Dec 17, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Oct 14, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Sep 2, 2009
Committee
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Sep 2, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jul 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 28, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-1)
assembly
May 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 20).
lower
May 7, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 5, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Re-referred. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 20).
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SB
Sam Blakeslee Ph.D.
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1536
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1536. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline