Public schools: parental access.
Summary
Existing law provides that the parents and guardians of pupils enrolled in public schools have the right and should have the opportunity, as mutually supportive and respectful partners in the education of their children within the public schools, to be informed by the school, and to participate in the education of their children, as specified, except to the extent that informing a parent or guardian or permitting participation by a parent or guardian in the education of a child conflicts with a valid restraining order, protective order, or order for custody or visitation issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. Existing law requires a school district to take all reasonable steps to ensure that all parents and guardians of pupils who speak a language other than English are properly notified in English and in their home language of these rights and opportunities. This bill would authorize parents and guardians of English learners to bring an oral language interpreter to all conferences, meetings, or proceedings held at a school district building or schoolsite or sponsored by the school district or school, except when prohibited by state or federal law.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 17, 2009 · Assembly Aug 20, 2009
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 36
Aug 17, 2009
D
Democratic23
82% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
5
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0)
assembly
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2662.)
lower
Aug 17, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-5)
senate
Aug 17, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 19 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (July 1).
upper
Jun 25, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 17, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 14, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 22).
lower
Apr 20, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ME
Mike Eng
DDemocratic
Co
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
Co
PW
Patricia Wiggins
DDemocratic
Co
TT
Tom Torlakson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1510
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1510. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline