Hazardous materials: methamphetamine laboratories.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control to take removal actions with respect to a hazardous substance that is an illegal controlled substance, a precursor of a controlled substance, or a material intended to be used in the unlawful manufacture of controlled substances. Existing law requires the department, on or before October 1, 2008, and to the extent funding is available, to develop health-based target remediation standards for iodine, methyl iodide, and phosphine. This bill would delete the date by which the department is required to develop these standards. (2) Existing law states that property contaminated by methamphetamine laboratory activity is safe for human occupancy only if the level of methamphetamine on an indoor surface is less than, or equal to, 0.1 micrograms per 100 square centimeters. Existing law establishes additional requirements for safe human occupancy if this activity included the use of lead or mercury. This bill would increase the methamphetamine level for this purpose from 0.1 micrograms per 100 square centimeters to 1.5 micrograms per 100 square centimeters. This bill would provide that these safety provisions do not preclude the department, in consultation with the Office of Health Hazard Assessment, from adopting stricter standards than the law would otherwise require. This bill would also delete obsolete provisions of law.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 27, 2009 · Assembly Sep 1, 2009
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
Aug 27, 2009
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican14
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-1)
assembly
Sep 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2846.)
lower
Aug 27, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (37-0-2)
senate
Aug 27, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 14, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
May 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 20).
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CS
Cameron Smyth
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1489
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1489. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline