AB 147 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Hazardous waste: electronic waste.

Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control to adopt regulations to prohibit an electronic device from being sold or offered for sale in this state if the electronic device is prohibited from being sold or offered for sale in the European Union on and after its date of manufacture, due to the presence of certain heavy metals. Existing law requires these regulations to take effect January 1, 2007, or on or after the date that the Directive 2002/95/EC, adopted by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union on January 27, 2003 (Directive 2002/95/EC) , takes effect, whichever date is later. Existing law defines the term "electronic device," for purposes of those provisions, to have the same meaning, with reference to the Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003, as "covered electronic device" which is defined as a video display device that is identified by the department, pursuant to specified regulations, as a presumed hazardous waste when discarded. A violation of the hazardous waste control laws, including a regulation adopted pursuant to those laws, is a crime. This bill would require a manufacturer of an electronic device, at the request of the department, based on the department's reasonable cause, as the bill would define that term, to believe that a specific electronic device identified by the department is prohibited from sale, to prepare and submit to the department within 28 days of receipt of the request, documentation or other information typically maintained by the manufacturer's industry under Directive 2002/95/EC, showing that the electronic device specifically identified by the department and sold or offered for sale by that manufacturer is not prohibited from sale. The bill would authorize the department to extend the 28-day response time at the request of the manufacturer. The bill would require the department to treat as confidential any information that is a trade secret, as defined, that is provided to the department pursuant to the bill's requirements, and that is identified as a trade secret at the time of submission, in the same manner as the procedures adopted by the department with regard to hazardous waste handling and disposal. The department would be required to make available, pursuant to the California Public Records Act, any information that is not a trade secret or that is not identified as a trade secret. Because a violation of the bill's requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Sep 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Jan 22, 2009 Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2009 · Assembly Jun 3, 2009

How they voted

2114
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 36
Sep 3, 2009
D Democratic23
21 Yea 2 Nay
91% Yea
R Republican13
12 Nay 1
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
34
Key actions
11
Committee
12
Amendments
7
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 49. Noes 28. Page 3227.)
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Committee
Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-14-1)
senate
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (August 17).
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 20, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jul 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 3, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (31-26-5)
assembly
Jun 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 29, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 6, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 4, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M. by unanimous consent, and then be re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 9, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD.
lower
Jan 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 22.
lower
0 primary · 7 co-sponsors

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.