Vehicles: nuisance abatement: impoundment.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county to establish a 5-year pilot program that implements a procedure to declare a motor vehicle to be a public nuisance when the motor vehicle is used in the commission of specified crimes related to prostitution. This bill would repeal the provisions authorizing the pilot program and would instead authorize a city, county, or city and county to adopt an ordinance declaring a motor vehicle to be a nuisance subject to an impoundment period of up to 30 days when the motor vehicle is involved in the commission of any one or more of specified crimes related to prostitution or illegal dumping of commercial quantities of waste matter upon a public or private highway or road, if the owner or operator of the vehicle has had a prior conviction for the same offense within the past 3 years. The bill would require the ordinance to include specified provisions related to notice, the payment of towing, storage, and administrative fees, the provision of a poststorage hearing, and the release of the impounded vehicle. This bill would also require the ordinance to provide that a person operating or in charge of a storage facility is civilly liable to the owner of the vehicle or the person who tendered the towing, storage, and related fees for 4 times the amount, not to exceed $500, if the person operating or in charge of the storage facility fails to comply with specified requirements to accept a valid bank credit card or cash for the payment of those fees.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Apr 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Dec 1, 2008
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 2, 2009 · Assembly Apr 20, 2009
How they voted
28–2
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 36
Sep 2, 2009
D
Democratic23
78% Yea
R
Republican13
76% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 3188.)
lower
Sep 3, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 5 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-2-6)
senate
Jun 9, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 9).
upper
Jun 3, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 30, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 20, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-4)
assembly
Apr 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 31).
lower
Mar 17, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 16, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 12, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 10, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 9, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 5, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Dec 2, 2008
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 1.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FF
Felipe Fuentes
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 14
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 14. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline