Advertising: grant deed copy services.
Summary
Existing law provides that certain advertising-related practices are unlawful and makes a violation of those provisions a crime. This bill would make it unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, association, or any other business entity to make any untrue or misleading statements in any manner in connection with the offering or performance of a grant deed copy service, defined as a service, offered through a mailed solicitation to a property owner, to obtain, for compensation, a copy of the property owner's grant deed or other record of title. The bill would make it unlawful to offer to perform this service without making specified disclosures. Because a violation of these provisions would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 12, 2010 · Assembly Jun 3, 2009
How they voted
22–8
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 37
Aug 12, 2010
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican12
66% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
9
Committee
11
Amendments
5
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 62. Noes 16. Page 6639.)
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 24).
lower
Aug 17, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B.,P. & C.P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 12, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-8-7)
senate
Aug 12, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 17 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 28, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 22).
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 2, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 3, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-28-2)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 20).
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1373
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1373. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline