Inmates: electronic monitoring.
Summary
Existing law provides that the board of supervisors of any county may authorize the correctional administrator to offer a program under which minimum security inmates and low-risk offenders committed to a county jail or other county correctional facility or granted probation, or inmates participating in a work furlough program, may voluntarily participate in a home detention program. Existing law also provides that the board of supervisors of any county may, upon determination by the correctional administrator that conditions in a jail facility warrant the necessity of releasing sentenced misdemeanor inmates prior to them serving the full amount of a given sentence due to lack of jail space, offer a program under which specified inmates may be required to participate in an involuntary home detention program. This bill would provide that, until January 1, 2015, upon determination of the correctional administrator that conditions in a jail facility warrant the necessity of releasing inmates being held in lieu of bail, the board of supervisors of any county may authorize the correctional administrator to offer a program under which these inmates may be placed in an electronic monitoring program, as specified. The bill would provide separate authority for voluntary and involuntary electronic monitoring programs. The bill would establish criteria for inmates to be eligible for programs established pursuant to its provisions and would specify circumstances under which inmates may be placed in these programs. The bill would also provide that defendants arrested for a bailable offense who are without any other warrant and who meet certain criteria may apply, after 10 court days from the date of arraignment, for release on reduced bail if the defendant agrees to be placed in the voluntary electronic monitoring program and the court and correctional administrator determine that the defendant is eligible to participate in the electronic monitoring program. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for any inmate who is a participant in an electronic monitoring program to fail to comply with the prescribed rules and regulations. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would specify, for persons pending disposition of charges, that electronic monitoring programs authorized pursuant to this bill include, but are not limited to, home detention programs, work furlough programs, and work release programs. The bill would make other conforming changes. Existing law provides for an administrative fee for specified work furlough and voluntary electronic home detention program participants. This bill would include participants in the voluntary electronic monitoring program for persons pending disposition of charges, and the existing voluntary home detention program, within the coverage of those administrative fee provisions, as specified. This bill would incorporate changes to Section 4532 of the Penal Code made by SB 1266, contingent on the prior enactment of that bill. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Vetoed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2010 · Assembly May 26, 2009
How they voted
23–8
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 23, 2010
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican12
58% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
54
Key actions
9
Committee
13
Amendments
8
Sep 29, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 55. Noes 19. Page 6795.)
lower
Aug 26, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (August 26).
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Committee
Action rescinded whereby the Assembly refused to concur in Senate amendments.
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Committee
Assembly refused to concur in Senate amendments.
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-8-4)
senate
Aug 23, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 3, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 27, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Sep 9, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jul 14, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 7).
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 26, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-1)
assembly
May 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 13).
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
MD
Mike Davis
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1369
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1369. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline