Residential self-regenerating water softeners.
Summary
Existing law requires the State Water Resources Control Board to formulate and adopt state policy for water quality control. California regional water quality control boards are required to establish water quality objectives in water quality control plans. Under existing law, a local agency, by ordinance, may limit the availability, or prohibit the installation, of residential water softening or conditioning appliances that discharge to the community sewer system if the local agency makes certain findings and includes them in the ordinance. This bill would authorize any local agency that owns or operates a community sewer system or water recycling facility, within specified areas of the state, to take action, by ordinance or resolution, after a public hearing on the matter, to control salinity inputs from residential self-regenerating water softeners to protect the quality of the waters of the state, if the appropriate regional board makes a finding that the control of residential salinity input will contribute to the achievement of water quality objectives. The bill would state related findings and declarations of the Legislature, including findings and declarations concerning the need for special legislation.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2009 · Assembly May 28, 2009
How they voted
24–10
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 40
Sep 3, 2009
D
Democratic25
80% Yea
R
Republican15
60% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
10
Committee
7
Amendments
6
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 56. Noes 15. Page 3200.)
lower
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-10-6)
senate
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 9, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 16, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 15, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
May 28, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (55-15-4)
assembly
May 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 13).
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (April 28).
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1366
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1366. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline