Pawnbrokers.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a pawnbroker from charging or receiving compensation at a rate exceeding 2.5% per month on that portion of the unpaid principal balance of any loan up to, including, but not in excess of $225. For other loan amounts, existing law prohibits a pawnbroker from charging or receiving compensation at a rate exceeding specified amounts based upon the unpaid principal balance of the loan. A knowing violation of the laws regulating pawnbrokers is a crime. This bill would revise these limits on pawnbroker compensation and would instead prohibit a pawnbroker from charging or receiving compensation at a rate exceeding 2.5% per month on the unpaid principal balance of any loan. Because a knowing violation of this bill's provisions would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 2, 2009 · Assembly May 11, 2009
How they voted
29–1
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 36
Sep 2, 2009
D
Democratic23
73% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
10
Committee
11
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-1-6)
senate
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 15, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (July 14).
upper
Jul 6, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 17).
upper
May 21, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., F. & I. and JUD.
upper
May 11, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0-2)
assembly
Apr 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 29).
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 20).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JC
Joe Coto
DDemocratic
Co
MW
Mimi Walters
RRepublican
Co
NT
Norma Torres
DDemocratic
Co
TH
Tom Harman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1357
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1357. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline