AB 1350 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Energy: regional mitigation.

Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. Except as provided, CEQA requires the lead agency to mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment of a project it carries out or approves whenever feasible to do so. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. The California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program requires a retail seller of electricity, including electrical corporations, community choice aggregators, and electric service providers, to purchase a specified minimum percentage of electricity generated by eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, in any given year as a specified percentage of total kilowatthours sold to retail end-use customers each calendar year. This bill would authorize the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to communicate, coordinate, and work with specified entities to consider and implement mitigation requirements on a regional basis for projects proposing to develop eligible renewable energy resources for the purposes of the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. The bill would authorize the commission to execute an agreement, memorandum of its understanding, or other similar instrument memorializing it understanding of any communication, coordination, or implementation activities with other state agencies for the purposes of meeting mitigation requirements on a regional basis.
Bill status failed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2009 Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 14, 2009

How they voted

570
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 62
May 14, 2009
D Democratic38
35 Yea 3
92% Yea
R Republican24
22 Yea 2
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
16
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Jun 10, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 10, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 21, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E., U., & C. and EQ.
upper
May 14, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-0-5)
assembly
May 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 6).
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SB
Sam Blakeslee Ph.D.
RRepublican
CA
15