Property taxation: possessory interests: Long Beach Courthouse.
Summary
Existing property tax law requires that all property subject to tax be assessed at its full value, and includes certain possessory interests among those property interests subject to tax. Existing property tax law defines a taxable possessory interest to be a use that is independent, durable, and exclusive. This bill would provide that, for purposes of the definition of a taxable possessory interest, a possession or use is not independent if it is pursuant to a project agreement and related agreements entered into by the Judicial Council with a nongovernmental entity, as specified, for the purpose of replacing the Long Beach Courthouse, if specified criteria are met. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute. Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires the Legislature to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 18, 2010 · Assembly Aug 27, 2010
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 34
Aug 18, 2010
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
12
Committee
12
Amendments
6
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (55-0-5)
assembly
Aug 27, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 6797.)
lower
Aug 26, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 26).
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 18, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-4)
senate
Aug 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 12).
upper
Aug 9, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.
upper
Aug 3, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 1).
upper
Jun 28, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
upper
Jul 8, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 30, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
upper
May 12, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 11).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BL
Bonnie Lowenthal
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1341
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1341. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline