School safety: immigration investigations.
Summary
Existing law recognizes that all pupils enrolled in the state public schools have the inalienable right to attend classes on school campuses that are safe, secure, and peaceful. Existing law establishes various safety programs and procedures to address issues relating to school safety. This bill would provide that it is the policy of the state that immigration agents should not interfere with the education of pupils in school. The bill would specify, however, that this policy not impede or restrict any lawful authority of immigration agents. The bill would, except as required by federal or state law, prohibit school officials and employees from collecting information or documents and from inquiring about the immigration status of pupils or their family members. The bill would, if an employee of a school is aware that a pupil's parent or guardian is not available to care for the pupil, encourage the school to comply with certain procedures relating to procuring child care for the pupil. The bill also would encourage schools to provide counseling services for pupils affected by enforcement activities of immigration agents, as specified.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Jan 20, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2009 · Assembly May 4, 2009
How they voted
24–13
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
Sep 3, 2009
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
7
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 49. Noes 29. Page 3215.)
lower
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-13-2)
senate
Jul 14, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and to third reading.
upper
Jul 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 7).
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 17, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 17).
upper
May 28, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 14, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ED. and JUD.
upper
May 4, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-26-2)
assembly
Apr 15, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (April 1).
lower
Mar 24, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jan 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 20.
lower
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 132
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 132. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline