AB 1315 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Telecommunications: Public Utilities Commission: Federal Communications Commission: forbearance petitions.

Summary
The federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, establishes a program of cooperative federalism for the regulation of telecommunications to attain the goal of local competition, while implementing specific, predictable, and sufficient federal and state mechanisms to preserve and advance universal service, consistent with certain universal service principles. The act authorizes an incumbent local exchange carrier, as defined, to file a forbearance petition with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to require the FCC to forbear from applying any regulation or any provision of the act to a telecommunications carrier, as defined, or telecommunications service, as defined, in any or some of its or their geographic markets, if the FCC makes certain determinations. Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including telephone corporations, as defined. This bill would provide that if an incumbent local exchange carrier files a forbearance petition with the FCC requesting that the FCC forbear from enforcing that carrier's duty to provide to any requesting telecommunications carrier nondiscriminatory access to network elements on an unbundled basis at any technically feasible point on rates, terms, and conditions that are just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory, within any metropolitan statistical area located in the state, the PUC would be required to participate in that forbearance proceeding by filing comments on the petition, providing data on competition in the metropolitan statistical area that is the subject of the petition, and taking any other action that advances the state's policies promoting competition in telecommunications markets. The bill would require the PUC to develop a sample data request for collecting data on competition in any California metropolitan statistical area, and would require all providers of voice communications services, as specified, to provide all data and other information relevant to the forbearance petition requested by the PUC. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the PUC is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill are within the act and certain of the bill's provisions require action by the PUC to implement, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 27, 2009 Signed Sep 27, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 18, 2010 · Assembly Jun 2, 2009

How they voted

330
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 37
Aug 18, 2010
D Democratic25
22 Yea 3
88% Yea
R Republican12
11 Yea 1
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
35
Key actions
13
Committee
13
Amendments
6
Sep 25, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 26, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6722.)
lower
Aug 25, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (August 25).
lower
Aug 23, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 18, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-4)
senate
Aug 18, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 3, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 16, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jul 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E., U., & C. and JUD.
upper
Jun 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (37-26-7)
assembly
May 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 20).
lower
May 6, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 4, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (April 27).
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FF
Felipe Fuentes
DDemocratic
CA
39